Committee Members: Laura Taylor, Susan Randolph, Davis Harris, Dana Warwick, Emily Burke
5.1 The system establishes a clearly defined ad comprehensive student assessment system.
2013-2014 - Level:3 out of 4, 2014-2015 - Level 3 out of 4, 2015-2016 - Level 3 out of 4
The school and personnel maintain and use a comprehensive assessment system that produces data from multiple assessment measures. Evidence: Measure of student learning common exams: http://www.nc.publicschools.org/educatoreffect/measures/ EVAAS: http://ncdpi.sas.com
Comparisons between classroom grades and state exam scores.
See: Power School System, MSL, VOCATS scores.
See: SRI Student Survey,
See: School Wide Rubrics.
See: EOG/EOC scores
5.2 Professional and support staff continuously collect, analyze, and apply learning from a range of sources, including comparisons and trend data about student learning, instruction program evaluation, and organizational conditions that support learning.
2013-2014 -Level 3 out of 4, 2014-2015 - Level 3 out of 4, 2015-2016 - Level 3 out of 4
The systematic process and procedure for collecting, analyzing and applying learning from multiple data sources are documented and used consistently by professional and support staff.
Evidence: EVAAS Data: http://ncdpi.sas.com
EVAAS data training at Wayne Community College. Common Core Training Jan. 3, 2013
See: PLAN scores
See: ACT scores
See: VOCAT scores
See: Power School System
5.3 Throughout the system professional and support staff are trained in the interpretation and use of data.
2013-2014: Level 3 out of 4, 2014-2015: Level 3 out of 4, 2015-2016: Level 3 out of 4
All professional and support staff members are assessed and trained in a rigorous, individualized professional development program related to the evaluation of data.
Evidence: NC Falcon training: http://center.ncsu.edu/nc/login
EVAAS training Common Core Training Jan. 3, 2013
EVAAS training Presentation.
Pearson Product Education: http://powersource.pearsonschoolsystems.com/training
NC Falcon Training
PLC/Staff Development Training
5.4 The school system engages in a continuous process to determine verifiable improvement in student learning,including readiness for and success at the next level.
2013-2014 - Level 3 out of 4, 2014-2015 - Level 4 out of 4, 2015-2016: Level 3 out of 4
Policies and procedures describe a process for analyzing data that determine verifiable improvement in student learning including readiness for the next level. Results indicate improvement and system and school personnel systematically use these results to design implement, and evaluate the results of continuous improvement action plans related to student learning including readiness for the next level. Increased rating for the 2014-2015 school year due to school-wide exceeding growth status.
Evidence: Policies http://www.waynecountyschools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=15663
See: MSL scores
See: Work Key scores
See: CTE minutes
See: VOCAT scores
See: Distantce Learning Report
See: College Success rate through Wayne Community College (students grades)
See: WSE Case Study of a Rural Inclusive STEM-Focused High School
See: Technology Gateway-real world problems, Simple Machines (Artifacts 3.3)
5.5 System and School leaders monitor and communicate comprehensive information about student learning, school performance, and the achievement of system and school improvement goals.
2013-2014 - Level 4 out of 4, 2014-2015 - Level 4 out of 4.
System and school leaders monitor comprehensive information about student learning system and school effectiveness, and the achievement of system and school improvement goals. Leaders regularly communicate results using multiple delivery methods and in appropriate degree of sophistication for all stakeholder groups.
Evidence: School Website: http://www.waynecountyschools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=16664
School Website community link: http://www.waynecountyschools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=13396
School Website Business Partner link:http://www.waynecountyschools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=13398
See: North Carolina Public School Report Cards
See: Advisory Council Meeting Minutes
See: WSE Case Study of a Rural Inclusive STEM-Focused High School (See: Artifacts 5.4)
Narrative: The evaluation ranking based on the continuous efforts of both the professional and support staff is as follows; 5.1 -5.3 received an overall rating of 3 out of 4. Collecting, analyzing, and applying data improves with each professional development session this year. Each educator has collaborated and utilized data during their weekly PLC meetings. The use of incorporating EVAAS data into the daily curriculum has become a more present and continuous process. Using a collection of results including pre-assessments, MSL, VOCAT, and EOC to provide data for differentiation, homogeneous grouping, and a point of reference to encourage growth at all levels. Standard 5.4 increased this year from a 3out of 4 to a 4 out of 4 because results indicate a significant improvement. The Evaluation ranking for 5.5 is a rating of 4 out of 4,the system and Mr. Hales effectively communicates comprehensive information about student learning, and school performance, and achievement of system and school improvement goals.